Re: ncftp status? (was re: Intent to package moxa radius)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ncftp status? (was re: Intent to package moxa radius)
From: "Rev. Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 21:34:31 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980424213431.A5111@earthlink.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2541680.3102445264@jmlb2.trin.cam.ac.uk>; from Jules Bean on Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:21:04PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 2541680.3102445264@jmlb2.trin.cam.ac.uk>

On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> I don't see any version of ncftp 2 in frozen?
> 
> Someone said it was GPL (and hence free) now?  And someone else said it had
> gone into hamm/main, but I don't seem to have it in my packages file...

It's there.  In main, I believe section net.

Attachment: pgpyVTMV5TmvV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- ncftp status? (was re: Intent to package moxa radius)
  - From: "Jules Bean" <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: ncftp status? (was re: Intent to package moxa radius)
Next by Date: why not mingetty??
Previous by thread: ncftp status? (was re: Intent to package moxa radius)
Next by thread: Re: ncftp status? (was re: Intent to package moxa radius)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread