Re: crypt++.el nonus or main

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 06 Apr 1998 22:50:49 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u386tc1y.fsf@1Cust99.max71.los-angeles.ca.ms.uu.net>
In-reply-to: gsstark@mit.edu's message of "06 Apr 1998 21:17:30 -0400"
References: <[🔎] 13603.37630.699665.942434@evinrude.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <[🔎] 871zvfoyy7.fsf@hal.olympus.fake> <[🔎] wwg4t0788lv.fsf@patty.verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE> <[🔎] ycqk992juqd.fsf@portE28.Generation.NET>

gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark) writes:

> Incidentally, I disagree with Guy's interpretation. I think mailcrypt's hooks
> are "specifically" for key management and cryptography and so make it non-US.

Some time ago we decided not to worry about packages which merely have
hooks for encryption as the distinction is quite fuzzy.

Guy

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark)

Prev by Date: Re: Immutable flag and packages
Next by Date: Re: X statement
Previous by thread: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Next by thread: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread