Re: APT broken ?
On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> Oh well, seems I didn't read carefully the new version of the
> Packaging manual. Can you point me to somewhere where I can find
> something about the disagreement for the format (which I don't
> understand, it seems pretty unmeaningful to make a package provides a
> range of version, it's like having a package with more than one
> version!). I currently try to make me up-to-date with the development
> of debian and it appears that I missed lot of things...
It was never discussed, nobody has said that they like the format you gave
or disliked it. The point is moot until dpkg can support it anyhow.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: