Re: HAMM FREEZE (removed packages)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Steve Greenland wrote:
> 1: Why is this "important"? It doesn't fit any definition of important
> that I've seen -- the package installs and works correctly.
(this is my opinion) Because it is really annoying to provide md5sums
which do not match the real contents of the package. Since not too many
packages have this bug it is better to rebuild them all before the release
and have a clean Debian 2.0 release. If you used debstd for the buggy
package, only a rebuild with the fixed debstd (debmake package) is
required.
> 2: Why was this bug filed 5 days before the freeze?
It was filed as soon as it was agreed those bugs should be filed, I think.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNQ/0VyqK7IlOjMLFAQH3wQQAn21n+8CJj0DQ2qUFnXBaOcMJ0h8/fYYn
rg+4yXmZ8M7EPXlKKqTuzbkPjQ5j39K02c0fdbYJTwdFWyycqDr/Hexih7LEp/8Y
Efqi9V/dxzcX8wi0Urt/BKlEXqrlCnsJA4i1ikqLa9b7P7uGCVPweCxbh0NqY1z2
Jw2/RBqQQRw=
=MEho
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: