Re: Planning new virtual packages for hamm
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
> That's exactly why I splitted. But, as they originally were package
> monolithically in an essential package, there are big problems when
> splitting (namely, can't use Pre-Depends to ensure e2fsprogs won't
> ever be broken because of one of the libs failing to unpack)
Could you please (re-)explain why you couldn't use a Pre-Depends in the
e2fsprogs package?
Remco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: