Re: Possible new name for "deity"
>>>>> "bruce" == bruce <bruce@va.debian.org> writes:
[snip a poor joke on my part]
bruce> Very offensive to religious people of the Judeo-Christian
bruce> tradition. Unitarian Universalist religious ceremonies
bruce> sometimes begin with the statement "Remember the Deity is
bruce> always present, even when not invoked". In their
bruce> tradition, "The Deity" _must_ mean "God", because there is
bruce> only one. The most important sentence of Jewish liturgy is
bruce> "The Lord is One". Islam has an almost identical statement
bruce> as its central dogma, "I witness that Allah is God and
bruce> there is no God but Allah". Forgive me if I word this
bruce> wrong, I think I have the sense correctly.
I understand your concern, Bruce. I would argue the philosphy further
but I see it serving no useful purpose. Just as long as the same
sensitivity is extended to the non-Abramic traditions, I've got nothing
against avoiding inappropriate terms. Enough said.
bruce> Consider how silly a lesser, but more familiar designation
bruce> sounds: it's not Emacs any longer, it's Saint Emacs!
Given the lack of amusement at my last attempt, I'm not touching this.
--
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: