Re: timezone -> timezones (why?)
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Also, please, do not make /etc/timezone a conffile in the new timezones
> > > package, because according to dpkg's packaging manual:
> > >
> > > 9.2 Fully-featured maintainer script configuration handling
> > >
> > > For files which contain site-specific information such as the hostname
> > > and networking details and so forth, it is better to create the file
> > > in the package's postinst script.
> > >
> > > [...]
> > I'm not sure what this has to do with /etc/timezone.
> The rationale for this is also in the policy:
> "Packages should try to minimise the amount of prompting they need to do".
> When a package has a "conffile", dpkg always asks about this file being
> replaced or not by the version inside the .deb file. But in this case:
> Who will want to replace, say, "Europe/Madrid" by "Factory"? This is a
> stupid question! That's why the policy says it is much better not to use
> conffiles "for files which contain site-specific information".
> > I can see your point, I just don't see any reason to change what works
> > simply because you don't like the idea of using conffiles.
> Perhaps I didn't explain well in my first mail about this. It is our
> policy who says we should try to minimise the amount of prompting.
Have you actually watched an upgrade of timezones?
No promting occurs.
_-_-_-_-_ Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 656-9769
Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road
e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Tallahassee, FL 32308
_-_-_-_-_-_- If you don't see what you want, just ask _-_-_-_-_-_-_-
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .