Re: Virtual Packages proposal
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam P Harris <apharris@onshore.com> writes:
Adam> [You (Christian Leutloff)]
>> there is IMHO no need to use a version number, the language
>> remains the same, only the libraries are changed and will be
>> changed in the future ...
Adam> No, there are language changes between 1.0 and 1.1. Note
Adam> sure about 1.2+... Examples of language changes can be
Adam> found on
However, jdk1.1 is backwardly compatible with 1.0.2. Why do we need
multiple virtual packages, presuming anyone providing jvm provides
a 1.1 compliant interface.
--
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: