Re: backwards compatibility was Re: Uploaded kernel-package 3.61
In article <[🔎] 87btw34c8u.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>,
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
>Juan> We won't need them at all if Dwarf releases the new libc6.
>
> Will people share the flack with me when people upgrade
> kernels without first upgrading libc6-dev, and having compilation
> break for them? Also, having trouble when they try to remove old
> kernels? Cause if you remove the symlinks now, old kernel image
> postrm shall bomb out.
Who cares? This is still the "unstable" tree. You can expect these things.
There has been no release of libc6 in "stable", so you won't break any
packages from stable with this.
Mike.
--
Miquel van Smoorenburg | The dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac lay in his bed
miquels@cistron.nl | awake all night wondering if there is a doG
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: