essential packages and Pre-Depends

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: essential packages and Pre-Depends
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:38:14 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980216112418.1723A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

FYI: I have submitted ("grave") bugs against all essential packages not
using the Predepends: header.

There was already a discussion on this for the gzip case, so I consider
this has been already discussed.

Thanks.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNOgWkSqK7IlOjMLFAQG7UAP8DylldbjTHhgtW3H09G+bPtCXSSCLHF84
sCwSim3WtnzcRwNjdK5MpkZ5sMMyRm5EYRQE6dsqS+06vtWZIRrWOV4b2AE5Txb9
t4HpTaHfMIYB6zOFnk/53ISwSjH92dvQmvNlL9nq1jqCl9phzl4BUnqCgNsTy7if
DzoqcylMBeE=
=i+Hb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: essential packages and Pre-Depends
  - From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
- Re: essential packages and Pre-Depends
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: essential packages and Pre-Depends
  - From: Chris Fearnley <cjf@netaxs.com>

Prev by Date: Processed: foo
Next by Date: Re: Applixware / Packaging Proprietary Software
Previous by thread: Processed: foo
Next by thread: Re: essential packages and Pre-Depends
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread