[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before freezing Hamm

In article <871zx7m9mo.fsf@wsuse5.mckesson.com>,
Stephen Zander <stephen.zander@interlock.mckesson.com> wrote:
>Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
>> But we could still avoid a little inconvenience to the poor user by
>> adding the Conflicts line.
>> It is really so much work?
>But how many more packages will need it? emacs can't be the only
>package with this problem!

It is my opinion that one shouldn't have to bother if it concerns
packages that have _only_ been released in "unstable". After all, it
_is_ unstable. If you upgrade from bo to hamm (once released) and there
is no problem - then there is no problem ..

 Miquel van Smoorenburg |  The dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac lay in his bed
    miquels@cistron.nl  |  awake all night wondering if there is a doG

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: