Re: over 30000 bugs in our archive (!)
On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 11:52:00AM -0800, David Welton wrote:
> I've got a question, which I'll post to the list in the hope that it
> will shed light on similiar reports that other people have received.
>
> E: epic: binary-without-manpage ircflush.epic
> E: epic: binary-without-manpage ircserv.epic
> E: epic: binary-without-manpage ircserv.epic
>
> These just don't have man pages.. Is there some way to include taht
> in the packaging information so that the various scripts will overlook
> it?
A known bug still is a bug. ;-)
Per policy every executable must have a man page. You can include links
from the missing manpage to undocumented.7.gz , but that doesn't avoid
the bug report, in fact the links can be added only _after_ the bug has
been reported.
--
Enrique Zanardi ezanardi@ull.es
Dpto. Fisica Fundamental y Experimental Univ. de La Laguna
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: