Re: splitting experimental by arch?
"Raul" == Raul Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Raul> [rather than a bunch of quotes, I'll just recap the points I
> Raul> think I got: "Experimental" is for dangerous packages and those
> Raul> with wild machine interface changes. Packages should be moved
> Raul> from "Experimental" to "Unstable" when the package is ready, as
> Raul> opposed to some phase in Debian's release schedule.]
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> wrote:
> I think you got that wrong. Experimental is for experimental
> packages, some of which also happen t be dangerous. I agree about the
> movement out to unstable.
I'm not sure what you mean.
What's an example of a package that is not dangerous to system
integrity, and doesn't have wildly different interfaces than before yet
should be included in "Experimental"?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .