Re: splitting experimental by arch?
>>"Guy" == Guy Maor <email@example.com> writes:
Guy> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> In that case, there should be an audit process in place and
>> packages placed in unstable should never automatically be headed
>> for stable, despite not having any bug reports filed.
Guy> That's fine with me. At each freeze, I've been asking for lists
Guy> of packages that shouldn't be released, and I always get some.
Guy> Perhaps I should ask the opposite question this time.
I changed my mind ;-). I think we do need a three tier
instability heirarchy as I mentioned in another message.
The decision doesn't have to be logical, it is unanimous.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .