[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: splitting experimental by arch?

>>"Guy" == Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu> writes:

Guy> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:
>> In that case, there should be an audit process in place and
>> packages placed in unstable should never automatically be headed
>> for stable, despite not having any bug reports filed.

Guy> That's fine with me.  At each freeze, I've been asking for lists
Guy> of packages that shouldn't be released, and I always get some.
Guy> Perhaps I should ask the opposite question this time.

	I changed my mind ;-). I think we do need a three tier
 instability heirarchy as I mentioned in another message.

 The decision doesn't have to be logical, it is unanimous.
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: