[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: splitting experimental by arch?

Manoj writes:
> If I have a package that is not yet production quality, it may have bugs
> (that destroy your file system, for example), but I need to distribute it
> so a few people with their eyes open can critique it and help fix any
> bugs, I distribute it to experimental.  That, in my opinion, is what the
> distribution is for.

Joost writes:
> Well, the opposing argument was that unstable is just the place for your
> package.

Then what *is* experimental for?

> And if it will take a long time for the package to become usable, then
> maybe Debian doesn't really want to distribute it?

And if it is the first release of a program written specifically for

Does this thread belong on policy?
John Hasler                This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org		   Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill         Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin         Do not send email advertisements to this address.

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: