Re: splitting experimental by arch?
> If I have a package that is not yet production quality, it may have bugs
> (that destroy your file system, for example), but I need to distribute it
> so a few people with their eyes open can critique it and help fix any
> bugs, I distribute it to experimental. That, in my opinion, is what the
> distribution is for.
> Well, the opposing argument was that unstable is just the place for your
Then what *is* experimental for?
> And if it will take a long time for the package to become usable, then
> maybe Debian doesn't really want to distribute it?
And if it is the first release of a program written specifically for
Does this thread belong on policy?
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
firstname.lastname@example.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .