Re: Lobby this, somebody
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 30 Jan 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> So why not clear up the confusion and create a libc6-kernel-headers package
> that unpacks in /usr/include ?
Yes. Why not?
This way we would have libc6-kernel-headers_2.0.32-1, and not
kernel-headers-2.0.32_2.0.32-1, and it would be much clear (having
2.0.32 in the package version, not in the name itself) that we only
provide a *single* set of headers for normal libc-dev development.
Only those who want to use another set of kernel headers will have to
care about the symlinks.
This would have also the advantage of not having to explain our users a
hundred of times why we were saying we didn't like symlinks and finally we
ended up using them...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNNHTRiqK7IlOjMLFAQFVZAP+JGbrpUBNQ0ylDSNek4qJ6eFOeMSob1qY
kGrMEGpJuBm9iyD7jdqErGY5Sfq6G+vi7tEIYvVXd1t8zaD4RW2J7BAp7Pcjvrga
qBkxUCo6h3Xs4llhl1PiuwkuJmegwHrO5eJQgcPWhC9uj9jG+FTGyGziVx8JamvP
GD9DJmvr7Os=
=5VB8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: