Re: Bug#16409: acknowledged by developer (libdb2 is not DFSG-free.)
On Thu, Jan 29, 1998 at 05:08:23PM +0100, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> The text which was suspect to me was
> :and DB may be freely redistributed and used under most non-commercial
> in the copyright file.
> As such, I suspect it is a comment or explanation (a confusing one though).
yes, it's their reply to my request of clarification for the license
terms. I suspect that it is due to the common belief that a "commercial"
license "must" be restrictive, something that Netscape (as well as
Oracle and Olivetti) are showing as non-automatically-true.
I also suspect that Bostic and Co. wants "commercial" people think that
they "have" to buy a commercial license from them to use db2 in a
commercial program :-)
| email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
> more than 35 months are needed to get rid of the millennium. [me]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .