Re: Gratuitous promotion of random binaries to standard
Dale Scheetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I was certain that I wouldn't get into this discussion. (So much for
> My concern is not so much with MC being rejected as a "standard" package,
> but more with the entrenched conservatism ...
I thought that's what "standard" meant in this context.
Raul, has many optional and extra packages installed on his systems
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .