Re: perl5.004 for bo
David Morton wrote:
> On 08-Jan-98 Martin Schulze wrote:
> > If all people who have noticed the lack are behaving like you did, no
> > wonder why there isn't such a perl update.
>
>
> EXCUSE ME?????? Ok, I already said I was not attacking anyone, but stating
> that I was upset. Maybe it's not common for ppl to share feelings. sheesh.
>
> Now I will attack you personally... *YOUR* response is why the business world
> shuns Linux. I have to put up with a lot of people giving me crap about
> the "poor support" that comes with linux. *USUALLY* that attitude has been
> way off base. Too bad people notice the bad much more than the good. I see
> now what they mean.
>
> I love linux, will continue to use it. Thanks for opening my eyes to the MIS
> point of view.
>
I think everyone agrees that there should have been a new package prepared for bo.
So we made a mistake. I'll never understand why free software gets
held to higher standards than commercial software. If this were a
Microsoft product everyone would just shrug their shoulders and get
on with life because they know nothing will be done within a year
(if at all).
Everyone in Debian is a volunteer. We're working just as many hours (or
more) as you and are doing this in our free time. And still, we manage to
put out a high quality product with support that most companies can only
dream about.
Please cut us a little slack or become a developer and help us do things
even better.
- Jay
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: