Re: bo-updates packages
Paul Seelig <pseelig@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de> writes:
> > Surely bo-unstable == hamm, so please invest your time in hamm, not
> > something that will be discarded in a few months.
> >
> Sure, but why invest my time in hamm which will be obsoleted in half a
> year anyway?
Wrong. What is your basis for saying this?
> While i like updated components i'm rather conservative
> regarding complete system upgrades. For me bo is running fine enough
> but i'd like to use a few features only present in more recent
> versions of Debian software. What's so bad about being a bit more
> oriented towards a user's perspective?
Nothing, if you want to you may recompile recent packages for your system.
> Well, i prefer to use the few months (pretty much time waiting BTW)
> until final release of hamm to upgrade the relyably stable system i'm
> working with now. I need software i can use today and can't wait for
> tomorrow to happen. Hey, Debian is not Microsoft!
I need software I can use today too, and hamm has that software right now.
Thanks to all the other developers for their hard work to build that
software.
Martin.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: