Re: bo-updates packages
martin@debian.org (Martin Mitchell) writes:
> Paul Seelig <pseelig@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de> writes:
>
> > Guess
> > why i proposed to name a directory with libc5 compiled hamm packages
> > "bo-unstable"?
>
> Surely bo-unstable == hamm, so please invest your time in hamm, not
> something that will be discarded in a few months.
>
Sure, but why invest my time in hamm which will be obsoleted in half a
year anyway? While i like updated components i'm rather conservative
regarding complete system upgrades. For me bo is running fine enough
but i'd like to use a few features only present in more recent
versions of Debian software. What's so bad about being a bit more
oriented towards a user's perspective?
Well, i prefer to use the few months (pretty much time waiting BTW)
until final release of hamm to upgrade the relyably stable system i'm
working with now. I need software i can use today and can't wait for
tomorrow to happen. Hey, Debian is not Microsoft!
Thank you, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig pseelig@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
My Homepage in the WWW at the URL http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: