Re: /usr vs. root was: /etc /usr/etc

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /usr vs. root was: /etc /usr/etc
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Date: 05 Jul 1997 17:11:09 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vi2p40aq.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>
In-reply-to: Vadim Vygonets's message of "Sat, 5 Jul 1997 23:32:00 +0300 (IDT)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970705231445.7286W-100000@beep.cs.huji.ac.il>

Hi,

	Yes, Debian people have their own brains. Therefore we, unlike
 Microsoft, follow standards, and the FSSTND happens to be one. I for
 one have not been impressed by the arguments so far.

	manoj
-- 
 "Louis Pasteur's theory of germs is ridiculous fiction". Pierre
 Pachet, Professor of Physiology at Toulouse, 1872
Manoj Srivastava               <url:mailto:srivasta@acm.org>
Mobile, Alabama USA            <url:http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: /usr vs. root was: /etc /usr/etc
  - From: Vadim Vygonets <vadik@cs.huji.ac.il>

Prev by Date: Re: /etc /usr/etc: solution?
Next by Date: problem with xconsole, named pipes
Previous by thread: Re: /usr vs. root was: /etc /usr/etc
Next by thread: Re: /usr vs. root was: /etc /usr/etc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread