Re: Should we implement a /etc/profile.d?

To: Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas König)
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should we implement a /etc/profile.d?
From: Rob Browning <osiris@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 01 May 1997 12:51:12 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87rafrozbv.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: Thomas Koenig's message of Thu, 1 May 1997 18:29:09 +0200 (MET DST)
References: <[🔎] 199705011629.SAA05831@mvmap66.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de>

Thomas Koenig <ig25@mvmap66.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de> writes:

> BTW, there's at least one bug outstanding (#4130) which can only be
> solved by setting an environment variable.

I haven't seen the bug report, but why couldn't it also be solved by a
suitable patch to the source to have a reasonable default?

-- 
Rob

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Should we implement a /etc/profile.d?
  - From: Thomas Koenig <ig25@mvmap66.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Package organization issue...
Next by Date: Re: Should we implement a /etc/profile.d?
Previous by thread: Re: Should we implement a /etc/profile.d?
Next by thread: Re: Should we implement a /etc/profile.d?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread