[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ppp's ip-{up,down} and possible utilization of 'run-parts'



Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:

> Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > Note, that I'm not saying that I can come up with a good argument why
> > it would be important to be able to make this distinction (or to even
> > do what I'm depicting in the example), but I am saying that since I
> > can't prove to myself that the exact arguement used to invoke pppd
> > will *never* be crucial, you shouldn't mangle it.
> 
> Alternate devices directories might be useful in a secured network
> environment (e.g. each physical set of connections gets its own
> directory with its own permissions).

Right...  Pretend like I used what Raul said as my example.

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94  53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: