Re: not a first amendment question
bruce@va.debian.org wrote on 29.11.97 in <19971129223845.25680.qmail@va.debian.org>:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > I am happy with this as long as you get rid of kjv-bible.
>
> Well, I think I'm going to exercise some _judgement_ and keep quake,
> fortune, the jargon file, and various bibles while moving purity out
> of the distribution. I find some redeeming features in the other stuff,
> not much in "purity".
I'm _seriously_ offended by this. The idea that the bible (or quake) has
more redeeming features than purity is ridiculous.
By the way, why the move to -devel?
MfG Kai
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: