Re: not a first amendment question
Erik Andersen <andersen@inconnect.com> writes:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 1997, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > bruce@va.debian.org wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we can safely draw the line somewhere before sex with animals and
> > > incest.
> >
> > I am happy with this as long as you get rid of kjv-bible.
And I suppose we'll be eliminating emacs as well because of the
`celibacy.1', `condom.1', and `sex.6' manpages it contains, with
references like this:
[...]
-P pedophilia (must specify a child process)
[...]
FILES
/usr/lib/sex/animals animals for bestiality
/usr/lib/sex/blackbook possible dates
/usr/lib/sex/sundaes sundae recipes
/usr/lib/sex/s&m sado-masochistic equipment
[...]
Heavens, to think that I read these pages before I turned 18! What a
horrible mess of a person I turned out to be!
--
Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu> <blp@gnu.org> <pfaffben@debian.org>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: