[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: not a first amendment question



Erik Andersen <andersen@inconnect.com> writes:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 1997, Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> > bruce@va.debian.org wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think we can safely draw the line somewhere before sex with animals and
> > > incest.
> > 
> > I am happy with this as long as you get rid of kjv-bible.

And I suppose we'll be eliminating emacs as well because of the
`celibacy.1', `condom.1', and `sex.6' manpages it contains, with
references like this:

[...]
     -P   pedophilia (must specify a child process)
[...]
FILES
     /usr/lib/sex/animals          animals for bestiality

     /usr/lib/sex/blackbook        possible dates

     /usr/lib/sex/sundaes          sundae recipes

     /usr/lib/sex/s&m         sado-masochistic equipment
[...]

Heavens, to think that I read these pages before I turned 18!  What a
horrible mess of a person I turned out to be!
-- 
Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu> <blp@gnu.org> <pfaffben@debian.org>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: