Re: Lessons (KDE & GNOME & Linux)
: The same way, I think it's important for Debian that the RedHat
: distribution exists because it creates a sane emulation of each (debian &
: RH's) team of developpers. Also users have at least 2 things to choose
: from (monopolies of any kinds are _bad_).
: So, I think it's a good thing we have both Kde & Gnome around: each team
: can "steal" ideas from the other and there's no "monopoly".
There are no only KDE and Gnome but a long list of other desktop projects
resulting in the development effort to be split. Too many things are
done again and again.
: > where I see a great danger of the Debian Project. The independant .deb
: > repository is a good way to have an outlet for creativity going beyond the
: > legalistic system Debian is generating.
: Agreed for the reasons given above: (Linux&FreeBSD(ok, Linux&WindowsNT by
: now;), Debian&RedHat, KDE&GNOME, "Official Debian"&"Unofficial Debian",
: : I doubt there will be enough packages any time soon in the
: "unofficial Debian" to produce a full distribution, but you get the
I doubt that this will ever happen. The main distribution has a certain
structure and that is beneficial to the whole. It seems that I want it
both ways. Maybe we can with the unofficial Debian packages.
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
Please always CC me when replying to posts on mailing lists.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .