Re: egcs libg++
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> > >
> > > > there is NO libg++ in egcs, only libstdc++
> > > > AFAIK, noone in egcs team is working on libg++
> > >
> > > Sorry, I did mean libstdc++. (It's part of the libg++ package i think?)
> > nope
> > libstdc++ now is included into egcs tarball.
> > Old GNU C++ library is removed and not supported.
> I know that, but Galen's .deb does not contain the libstdc++ from egcs,
> and we don't have an egcs libg++ shared lib in the packaging system, ie
> it's totally usless currently.
well, we don't have egcs either. Nevertheless i've installed
egcs in local dir and it works without problmes.
> I don't think I have enough disk space to actually compile egcs and it's
> libstdc++ as well as the new libc6 from source.
AFAIK, i have to have 200+ meg to compile glibc.
egcs compilation takes < 100 (and that amount i can afford)
> > they coexist on my system quite well
> > (i'm having old libstdc++ but recent egcs c++/gcc etc).
> Sorry, I ment to have the egcs libstc++ and gcc libstc++ co-exist, both
> sets of headers and both sets of shared libs. The shared libs I can see,
> but how about the headers?
sorry, i mislead you. Old libstdc++ means not from recent
egcs, but from a bit old snapshot (something around
libg++ 2.8.0b6), not 2.7.2 version.
Still i have libstdc++2.7.2.so and libstdc++2.8.0.so installed. They
coexist quite nicely
> I really want to try egcs, it seems to have many many many C++ bug fixes,
> gcc 2.7.2 is pretty bad..
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .