Re: Once again: libc6 packages compatibility etc...

[Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>]

> But that's what we are doing by using this "g" convention anyway !
> 
> When I advocate concistency, it's just to prevent having libc5/6
> distinction done by some maintainers using "g", and by others by
> suppressing any superfluous "lib" in the package's name.

So, is the "g" suffix intended to be used forever after?  Once libc5 is
dead and gone, are we still to end every library in "g"?

                                          Brian
                                 ( bcwhite@verisim.com )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Friends are relatives that you make for yourself.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .