Re: Package names and the year 2000.
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> No, but they contain "97". Do this refer to year 97 or to year 1997?
> If it does refer to year 1997, then why the package name is not pj1997n08?
Dates with the day first are a problem, as are those with the month as a
word. This one isn't - we just need to use an epoch in the year 2000 (and
increment it in 3000 if debian's still around then :)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .