Re: Package names and the year 2000.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
>
> > I have been reporting as a bug all packages containing dates in the
> > version number *not* in the form "YYYY.MM.DD" or "YYYY.MM".
> > ...
> > doc/pj97n09_2.deb
> > doc/pj97n08_2.deb
> > ...
>
> These don't contain dates in version number.
No, but they contain "97". Do this refer to year 97 or to year 1997?
If it does refer to year 1997, then why the package name is not pj1997n08?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNBZ8DiqK7IlOjMLFAQHcIQP/SpT3edGLV6xZ05ChLnJXpS+EYC38CewJ
uyQgWXTMco5sJTvN80o1fVM6p9tZqz0G0q95kOY+9PTQeqSjPoGNPGN5Yu/S+M5L
iK4MP23WDO86vt6pY/49QhBlZQNexT3pK/7ApyheeSHSNC9vlahWOPc7IGBNyT+c
bUMbwaPVtOw=
=Kd1G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: