Re: Package names and the year 2000.
Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> I have been reporting as a bug all packages containing dates in the
> version number *not* in the form "YYYY.MM.DD" or "YYYY.MM".
These don't contain dates in version number.
| email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .