Re: Virtual Package Names
> Hi,
>
> I was just testing some code and I noted that there are a number of
> virtual packages that do not appear in the 'Authoritative List of
> Virtual Package Names'
> (http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-policy/related-docs/virtual-package-names-list.text)
>
> Is this okay?
>
> Here a few,
> gs_x (gs, gs-aladdin)
I think it's better to just use "gs" for any version of gs.
the gs_x used to be used for "gs with X11". There also was
a "gs_svga", and "gs_both".
Also, the use of underscores in package names is not allowed, so
I think we shouldn't use them in virtual packages eighter.
--
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: