Re: Dpkg and version numbering
On 12 Aug 1997, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I have the following problem with dpkg version numbering:
> dpkg considers version numbers 2.01 and 2.1 being equal.
> Yes, it is according to algorithm described in dpkg manual, but I'm
> not sure whether this is the best behaviour.
I would not recommend doing this, although it looks correct in the case
you gave, what about things like:
2.01.1 vs 2.1.1
Which is newer? It could become confusing to us humans..
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .