Re: non-debian kernels -- bizzar?
On Tue, Jul 29, 1997 at 11:19:08AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hamish> called previous. Any chance that upon removing a
> Hamish> kernel-package generated kernel package, things could be
> Hamish> changed back? Since no history is available except the
> Hamish> previous I would assume that would mean both the current and
> Hamish> previous (/vmlinuz and /vmlinuz.old) would now point to the
> Hamish> previous version.
>
> Hmm. This may not be fully possible (I mean, I don't know what
> to link to /vmlinuz.old). Take the following seqence of events as an
> example.
>
> vmlinuz vmlinuz.old
> Delete 2.0.28 2.0.29 ?????? (2.0.26?)
Indeed as I said, since history is not available this is difficult.
I can only suggest that both vmlinuz and vmlinuz.old go to 2.0.29;
this is better than leaving it hanging, which I think is what happens now
(and breaks LILO).
hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust hmoffatt@mail.com
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [***** ] 50%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. --Bohr
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: