Re: source dependencies
On Jul 24, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote
> Why don't we just make this list "minimal" and remove everything but
> libc6-dev? (or libc-dev, using a virtual name).
>
> If we assume such a big list of development libraries, there would be very
> few Source-Depends, and a lot of useful information would be lost.
that will be more work, but we will gain more informations.
what about flex, bison, debmake and perl ?
we could also gain more information.
(ok, perl will be available on any machine for dpkg-dev).
comments ?
andreas
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: