Re: source dependencies
According to Vincent Renardias:
> On 22 Jul 1997, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.970722213826.17354D-100000@odin.waw.com>,
> > Vincent Renardias <vincent@waw.com> wrote:
> > >Another problem is that bin86 is necessary to compile a kernel (i386) and
> > >that bin86 _should_ be put in non-free...
> >
> > Why? I'm not sure which version Debian uses, but I remember that
> > Bruce Evans put the GPL on bin86 a few years ago especially for Linux.
>
> Then I guess bug #1281 can be closed...
I spoke a bit too fast I am afraid, or rather, I formulated it wrong. I
ment this more as a question, but I forgot to add
"is there anyone who can confirm this"
The best solution is ofcourse to just mail the author, Bruce Evans.
Mike.
--
| Miquel van Smoorenburg | "I need more space" "Well, why not move to Texas" |
| miquels@cistron.nl | "No, on my account, stupid." "Stupid? Uh-oh.." |
| PGP fingerprint: FE 66 52 4F CD 59 A5 36 7F 39 8B 20 F1 D6 74 02 |
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: