Re: source dependencies
On 22 Jul 1997, James Troup wrote:
> Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de> writes:
>
> Why not skip all essential/required packages and assume they're
> installed as we do for binary dependencies? That leaves
>
> > bin86 binutils bison cpp debmake dpkg-dev fakeroot file flex gcc
> > kernel-headers make patch perl
>
> kernel-headers and bin86 are unnecessary, because they're not needed
> for compilation of the vast majority of packages (I've never had to
> use either of them for m68k compiles (obviously I couldn't use
> bin86)).
Another problem is that bin86 is necessary to compile a kernel (i386) and
that bin86 _should_ be put in non-free...
Cordialement,
--
- ** Linux ** +-------------------+ ** WAW ** -
- vincent@debian.org | RENARDIAS Vincent | vincent@waw.com -
- Debian/GNU Linux +-------------------+ http://www.waw.com/ -
- http://www.debian.org/ | WAW (33) 4 91 81 21 45 -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: