Re: /usr vs. root was: /etc /usr/etc
On 7 Jul 1997, Carey Evans wrote:
> Vadim Vygonets <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On 6 Jul 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > So, we decide on placing files dependeing on where the
> > > upstream sources put their files? This does not sound like a sound
> > > technical policy to me. Remember, most authors do not write with
> > > Debian's file system discipline in mind.
> > And you know why? Because other Unices have similar filesystems,
> > i.e., noone puts site-wide conffiles in /etc. The authors kept in
> > mind the more technical definition of files which must go to /usr,
> > that is, the files that don't have to be different on the machines
> > across the network (like hostname), aren't essential for boot or
> > single-user mode maintainance.
> Some authors feel a bit differently. Dan Bernstein, for example,
> thinks that all a program's files should go in the same place, and
> that /var is a good place for this (/var/qmail). Other packages do
> this by default as well, like apache and jed.
It isn't in /usr because qmail and http daemons are machine-local, not
essential for booting or maintainance, and they have plenty of files,
while the root partition is usually limited to something like 16M.
And about jed: I thought that it puts conffiles in /usr/local/lib or
/usr/lib... Am I wrong?
Vadim Vygonets * email@example.com * firstname.lastname@example.org * Unix admin
The fish doesn't think, because the fish knows... everything.
-- Arizona Dream
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .