Re: Proposal: /etc /usr/etc /usr/local/etc
On Fri, 4 Jul 1997, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> It occurs to me as strange that noone in this debate had mentioned the
> transname patch, available in the 2.1 sources. It was developed as a
> solution to exactly the same problem Vadim describes.
> Please read /path_to_kernel-2.1_source/Documentation/transname.txt
I will. But debian doesn't use 2.1 kernels.
> I then suggest to mount /usr and /etc from the central server. /etc could
> overmount an existing /etc with a minimum of files in it needed while /usr
> is not reachable.
What about /etc/hostname, /etc/inetd.conf and /etc/X11/XF86config?
Vadim Vygonets * email@example.com * firstname.lastname@example.org * Unix admin
The fish doesn't think, because the fish knows... everything.
-- Arizona Dream
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .