Re: new approach: Documentation Policy
Christian Schwarz writes:
> What would be the best way to get the PostScript files? I see two
> different options that should be supported either case: generation on
> demand, as you run `man -t', and generation via a CGI script, for example,
> "dwww" will contain a menu of all available docs. It would be nice to have
> a hyperlink "printable version" next to the hyperlink that links to the
I'd suggest to make it explicit in the text that the document has to
be generated (if not cached); eg something like "generate printable version".
> So I would suggest using
>
> /usr/doc/<pkg>/html
Agreed.
> for GNU info converted HTML files. (Some packages may provide both types
> and we should try not to mix them.) Of course,
>
> /usr/doc/<pkg>/html/{texinfo,texi,info}
>
> or other options to consider.
This last one would make other formats fit quite good; eg:
/usr/doc/<pkg>/html/sgml/
Note that for texi-converted html, it would probably be better to
forget "info", using either of /usr/doc/<pkg>/html/{texinfo,texi},
as /usr/doc/<pkg>/html/info would suggest something like info2www.
--
Yann Dirson <dirson@univ-mlv.fr>
http://monge.univ-mlv.fr/~dirson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: