[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re^2: Status of Debian Policy

[ Please don't Cc: public replies to me. ]

Marco Budde:
> That's right. But a lot of important packages like doc-linux don't use  

The transition to using HTML as the primary on-line documentation
format is somewhat incomplete, yes. :)

> I would suggest, that we introduce a new directory /usr/html or

Er, no. All documentation goes below /usr/doc (or /usr/share/doc
under the new version of FSSTND (to be known as FHS :)). That
manual pages and info files go under /usr/man and /usr/info,
respectively, is because of historical and techical
reasons. There's no need to do that for HTML. It's better to
keep documentation in one place so that it can, for example, be
shared between machines easily. It also makes it easier to
access them via the Debian web server setups.

(This has, I think, also been discussed.)

Please read <http://www.iki.fi/liw/mail-to-lasu.html> before mailing me.
Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list.

Attachment: pgpsIL4fLRohL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: