Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?
In your email to me, Rob Browning, you wrote:
> Nathan E Norman <email@example.com> writes:
> > Not that anyone necessarily has the time, but would it be worthwhile to
> > create some documents listing categories of packages, comparing and
> > contrasting the competing packages?
> Right. I'm about to help someone set up a relatively busy mailserver,
> and though I'm only familiar with sendmail, it'd be nice to know if
> one of the others would be a better choice.
Exim, at first gave me problems, but has proven to be just what I
needed. Virtual domains are a no-brainer, and, if your machine
delivers a lot of mail to a single machine or domain at one time
(like a dialup going online 1/day), exim will tunnel all the mail
down the one connection instead of spawning off a separate process
for each one.
(work) firstname.lastname@example.org / (home) email@example.com - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
"Management decisions have no effect on the laws of physics."
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .