Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?

[sailer@sun10.sep.bnl.gov (Tim Sailer)]

In your email to me, Rob Browning, you wrote:
> 
> Nathan E Norman <nnorman@cfni.com> writes:
> 
> > Not that anyone necessarily has the time, but would it be worthwhile to
> > create some documents listing categories of packages, comparing and
> > contrasting the competing packages?
> 
> Right.  I'm about to help someone set up a relatively busy mailserver,
> and though I'm only familiar with sendmail, it'd be nice to know if
> one of the others would be a better choice.

Exim, at first gave me problems, but has proven to be just what I
needed. Virtual domains are a no-brainer, and,  if your machine
delivers a lot of mail to a single machine or domain at one time
(like a dialup going online 1/day), exim will tunnel all the mail
down the one connection instead of spawning off a separate process
for each one.

Tim

-- 
 (work) sailer@bnl.gov / (home) tps@buoy.com - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
       "Management decisions have no effect on the laws of physics."
          -- anon
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .