[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Simple policy question...

In article <m0wckoh-000FCyC@alex>,
	Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@is5.nyu.edu> writes:

> The most solid ground not to switch to libc6 is not instability from the
> user's point of view (may be libc6 is not that bad), but from the point of
> view of developer who's using different kind of commercial developmental
> suits. 

No, that's a good reason not to install libc6 development stuff. It's not a
good reason to not install the libc6 runtime and programs that use it, which
is what we were talking about.

> Unfortunately, as far as I can see, there is no clean way to
> have both developmental trees (libc5 and libc6) on the same machine.

There cannot be a really good way, but I think they altdev packages are
about as good as possible.

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: