Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, SirDibos wrote:
>speaking of which. if I packaged up fetchpop, could it get included in
>debian? I much prefer it to fetchmail. if only fetchmail had a -o or a
>localfolder option! Also, fetchpop guides you thru creation of the
>appropriate config file the first time you run it. *and* it pipes the
>stuff transparently thru procmail for you. Which is a bonus, since it
>always screwed up when I tried cat /var/spool/mail/$USER |procmail, and
>didnt work at *all* when I just plain ran procmail by itself
Package it up. No problem.
>Sounds good to me. I am an advocate of many solutions.... I hate to see
>any software get dropped from the distribution. Hell, I still think we
>should have continued to include *both* anagram generating programs.
><sigh> Yup, I'd like to give chos a try.
You misunderstand whats going on here. Exim and Chos are part of the
Debian distribution. The issue is which packages are installed by default.
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .