Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, SirDibos wrote:
> I second the motion. Smail has been nothing but a headache for me. I was
> *so* releived to get fetchpop working, so that I could bypass the need to
> pass my mail thru port 25 on my own machine for delivery.
> pine + fetchpop + procmail serves all my email needs. (Im not up 24/7, so
> its ok ;))
> speaking of which. if I packaged up fetchpop, could it get included in
> debian? I much prefer it to fetchmail. if only fetchmail had a -o or a
> localfolder option! Also, fetchpop guides you thru creation of the
> appropriate config file the first time you run it. *and* it pipes the
> stuff transparently thru procmail for you. Which is a bonus, since it
> always screwed up when I tried cat /var/spool/mail/$USER |procmail, and
> didnt work at *all* when I just plain ran procmail by itself
Try fetchmail's `-m' option. For example:
fetchmail -a myserver -m "$HOME/bin/my.processing.script"
Where $HOME/bin/my.processing.script is just:
formail -Y -I Status: -s procmail
It works for me.
BTW: There will be a completely GPLed procmail in hamm soon. Could we make
it the "standard MDA" as well? :-) [ Red-Hat *already* does this ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .