RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <nick@Feedback.com.ar> wrote:
> One package with misc/general manpages and another with development
>manpages. What do you think?
I think that (at least) the "undocumented.?" pages should go in a
separate package, or even back into the man-db package. I don't have
manpages installed (because they're big), so whenever man regenerates
its database, I get warnings about bad symlinks from any packages which
White pages entry, with PGP key: <URL:http://alethea.ukc.ac.uk/wp?95cpb4>
PGP public keyprint: 74 68 AB 2E 1C 60 22 94 B8 21 2D 01 DE 66 13 E2
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .