Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3
"Boris D. Beletsky" <borik@isracom.co.il> writes:
>
> >>>>>>>> On 21 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> Goerzen> Since we know of a number of things that have been broken in
> Goerzen> 2.0.30 (such as IP masquerading being totally hosed), why
> Goerzen> are we distributing that version with 1.3? It seems like a
> Goerzen> rather bad idea because it could very well break the setups
> Goerzen> of a number of people.
> Goerzen>
>
> I agree, I also heard that Ip Masquerading is not the only thing
> that seems to be broken.
>
> thks,
> borik
> --
While there seems to be consensus on this, it remains a mystery to me,
as we have been running 2.0.30 on our masq box successfully for some
time now. Am I missing something? (Maybe this is a reference to a
new version of ipfwadm being required. If so, can't that be
conspicuously included and advertised in the new distribution?)
--
cmaguire@enhanced.com Camm Maguire
==================================================================
"The earth is one country, and mankind its citizens." Baha'u'llah
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: