Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3

["Boris D. Beletsky" <borik@isracom.co.il>]

>>>>>>>> On 21 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote:

 Goerzen> Since we know of a number of things that have been broken in
 Goerzen> 2.0.30 (such as IP masquerading being totally hosed), why
 Goerzen> are we distributing that version with 1.3? It seems like a
 Goerzen> rather bad idea because it could very well break the setups
 Goerzen> of a number of people.
 Goerzen>
 Goerzen> -- John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
 Goerzen> Custom Programming | jgoerzen@complete.org |
 Goerzen>
 Goerzen> -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word
 Goerzen> "unsubscribe" to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org.
 Goerzen> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

I agree, I also heard that Ip Masquerading is not the only thing
that seems to be broken.

thks,
borik
--
Boris D. Beletsky                          borik@debian.org
Network Administrator                   borik@cs.huji.ac.il
Institute of Computer Science,          borik@isracom.co.il
Hebrew University                      Home: +972 2 6411880
Jerusalem Israel                       Work: +972 2 6585690


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .