Re: Bug#10060: libc6-dev: time.h and linux/time.h conflict
You're absolutely right. I should have thought before I posted. In fact
I already patched ibcs to work regardless which gcc/C library is used,
since ibcs (as a kernel module) should include the kernel headers, but
not the differing application headers.
I'm sorry for reporting a non existant bug.
P.S.: It was one of those days ...
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | topystem Systemhaus GmbH
firstname.lastname@example.org | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
email@example.com | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
>Von: Helmut Geyer[SMTP:Helmut.Geyer@IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Mai 1997 19:48
>An: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
>Betreff: Re: Bug#10060: libc6-dev: time.h and linux/time.h conflict
>> Package: libc6-dev
>> Version: 2.0.3-4
>> Just try to compile ibcs. I won't work because one source file includes
>> <time.h> and <linux/sched.h> (or others), which includes <linux/time.h>.
>> This gives an error condition since both files have a different definition
>> structure timespec. In fact it's not that much of a difference (long vs.
>> long int) but enough for gcc to see an error. There are other double
>> structures in other files (e.g. timeval, timezone, itimerval).
>That is right, but this is _not_ a bug in libc 6 but comes from the fact that
>many Linux applications use the kernel haeders themselves, which generally is
>a bad idea anyway.
>The change in the C library (i.e. to provide headers for all the stuff that
>not really kernel-dependant) is coordinated with Linus and the kernel
>These problems are bugs (or lets say portability problems) in the packages..
>IBCS should be fixed, not libc6.
>public PGP key available : finger
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .